Home DWP Terminally ill face severe financial hardship because of an 'outdated' benefits system

Terminally ill face severe financial hardship because of an ‘outdated’ benefits system

Must Read

UK pensioners ‘suffering the worst poverty rate in western Europe’

Tories warned against further rises to the state pension age.

A homeless person dies every 19 hours in austerity Britain

Services are failing to protect homelessness people, say campaigners.

New DWP Secretary called for ‘tax on pensioners’

Tories can't be trusted on pensions, says SNP MP.

One in four households facing homelessness are already in work

Campaigners calls for the reversal of social security benefit cuts.

Terminally ill people face severe financial hardship and crippling debt, because of a “made-up policy fudge” invented three decades ago, a new report has revealed.

The damning inquiry report from the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Terminal Illness found that the current benefits system rule that you must only have six months or less to live to get fast access to benefits is “outdated, arbitrary and not based on clinical reality”.

Information uncovered during the inquiry shows that the current ‘six-month rule’ definition of terminal illness, used extensively to determine how quickly someone gets access to benefits, was invented by politicians, and has no clinical evidence to support its use.

The ‘six-month rule’ was introduced into the benefits system in 1990 to exempt terminally ill people from having to wait to qualify for Attendance Allowance, a specific benefit which could only be accessed if someone was ill for a minimum of six months.

Photo: Pixabay

However, the six-month timescale was then extended arbitrarily to other benefits over time, as well as rules for accessing a terminal illness lump sum in pensions law. Consequently, the ‘six months rule’ became the benefits system’s definition of terminal illness by default.

Commenting on the report’s findings, Drew Hendry MP, Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Terminal Illness, said: “The current rules seriously restrict access to vital financial support for many terminally ill people, whose condition will never improve and only deteriorate until they die, but who may live for longer than six months.

“The policy is not only very hard on people living with terminal illnesses, it also causes a great deal of financial pressure and worry on their families at the very worst time in their lives.”

The Department of Work and Pensions’ (DWP) processes were also heavily criticised for being “overly-time consuming, demeaning and insensitive”.

One bereaved husband told the inquiry: “My wife was terminally ill for over three years – we effectively lost everything we ever worked for and I am now left with debts of over £20,000.”

Martine Adams, 28, from Barry in Wales, was diagnosed in January 2019 with a Diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumour, a rare cancer of the central nervous system.

“My life has changed dramatically, so drastically”, she said. “I can’t be on my own with my children. I can’t do the normal things that I would have done, it hurts, I’m in too much pain.

“I can’t work, I’m not reliable enough, but I’m 28 and I don’t want to live the rest of my life on £600 a month.

“I remember ringing PIP, pressing the number for terminal because I had been told it was terminal, and the lady on the phone said ‘hello, have you got six months or less to live?’

“I said no, and she said ‘oh, well that’s what this is for.’ I remember questioning whether I was terminal, and I second guessed it.

“I spoke to my nurse and she said ‘yes, it’s like Alzheimer’s, dementia, they are terminal illnesses, that’s what you’ve got.’

“I remember thinking it didn’t make any sense.”

Campaigners protest against Government welfare policies. Photo: Paula Peters

The APPG is calling on the UK government to scrap the ‘six-month rule’ for benefit entitlement and adopt a new definition of terminal illness, based on a new law in Scotland that will allow clinicians to use their own judgment to certify if a person is terminally-ill, with no arbitrary time limit.

Matthew Reed, Chief Executive of Marie Curie, said: “The inquiry’s findings are clear – the current system is not fit for purpose and the ‘six-month rule’ does not make sense. Yet, everyday it is making terminally ill people’s lives a total misery, when they should be focused on living well for as long as they can.

“Whether somebody with a terminal illness has six months to live or longer, their needs are the same – it cannot be right to deny them access to the financial support they need based on a ‘made up policy fudge’ invented decades ago.

“Marie Curie welcomes the recommendations of the inquiry report.”

Drew Hendry MP added: “I am very proud of the work Marie Curie and the APPG have done to highlight the impact the six-month rule has on those who are terminally ill, but who may live longer than six months and thank everyone who took time to submit evidence to our inquiry.

“I hope that the Minister will now give serious consideration to our report findings and commit to ending this arbitrary six-month rule.”

Disclaimer: This article is based upon an official press release from Marie Curie cancer support.

Support Us!

Please support our work in highlighting the struggles faced by poor and vulnerable people in the UK with a small donation. Please only give as much as you can afford.



Latest News

Disabled people’s needs ignored by the UK fashion industry

75% of disabled people say their needs are not being met by mainstream fashion in UK.

One in four households facing homelessness are already in work

Campaigners calls for the reversal of social security benefit cuts.

‘Shocking’ impact of UK welfare cuts revealed

Impact of Tory welfare cuts on Scottish households laid bare in damning new report.

Unpaid carers unable to see a doctor because they can’t get a break from caring

Charity calls for better support for unpaid carers to enable them to take breaks from caring.

Homelessness in England soars 11% as campaigners demand £12.8bn every year for social housing

Campaigners blame a national shortage in homes for social rent and cuts to social security benefits.