Home Society Osborne's Benefit Cuts Will Increase Income Inequality, Says Economist

Osborne’s Benefit Cuts Will Increase Income Inequality, Says Economist

Must Read

Number of Brits suffering from malnutrition has soared under the Tories

Labour described the shocking increase in malnutrition cases as "unforgivable" and said government ministers "should be ashamed".

Benefit claimant with broken back killed himself after being found ‘fit for work’ by DWP

He was left pennniless and unable to pay the rent or top up his electricity meter.

Universal Credit staff poised for further walk-outs

PCS union warns that strike action could spread to more Universal Credit Services Centres.

UK pensioners ‘suffering the worst poverty rate in western Europe’

Tories warned against further rises to the state pension age.

Planned cuts to social security benefits will ‘inevitably’ increase income inequality in the UK, a respected economist has warned.

In a blog for the Resolution Foundation think tank, Chief Economist Matthew Whittaker warns that with £12 billion in welfare cuts due in the coming years, an “increase in inequality appears inevitable”.

Mr Whittaker writes that with the introduction of a so-called National Living Wage, announced by George Osborne in the Autumn Spending Review, some of the lowest paid workers should see a “boost” in wages from April next year.

However, he adds that “because of the way such jobs are shared across households, this does not have a direct feed through to income growth”.

Mr Whittaker urged the Government “to focus not just on the strength of the economic recovery, but on the distribution of its gains too.”

“With £12 billion of benefit cuts due in the coming years – all of which will fall on working-age households – some increase in inequality appears inevitable”, he says.

He also highlighted how low-income households have experienced “difficulty paying for their accommodation in the past 12 months”, affecting around one-in-four families in the bottom income bracket (quintile).

Source: Resolution Foundation.
Source: Resolution Foundation.

A report published by the OECD (pdf) in February 2015 revealed how “the average income of the richest 10% is almost 10 times as large as for the poorest” households in the UK, with the OECD average being 9.5.

And this is before more recent welfare cuts are taken into account.

“The level of income inequality among the total population in the United Kingdom has been well above the OECD average in the last three decades”, the report says.

The report concluded: “Taxes and benefits reduce income inequality by a quarter in the UK. This is in line with the OECD average, but below other European countries such as France, Germany or the Nordics.”

“Changes in taxes and benefits combined have reduced household income on average in the UK since 2007.

“The reduction has not been as large as in Ireland, Portugal, Iceland and Spain, but on the other hand, in United States, Germany, Estonia and France, tax-benefit changes increased household incomes over the same period.”

Raiding the piggy bank.
Raiding the piggy bank.

Researchers noted that “UK fiscal consolidation was driven mainly by changes in benefits”, while in other countries “income tax changes played an important role”.

The UK was already among the ten worst countries for income inequality in 2014, with the bottom 10% of the population not seeing a real rise in income at all in the previous decade.

When inflation is taken into account, this effectively means that the poorest 10% were worse off in 2014 than ten years earlier.

The richest families in Britain now control around 31% of the nations wealth, with the poorest 10% controlling just over 1%.


SUPPORT US!

If you would like to see more stories like this please consider a one off donation. Thank you for your support!

2 COMMENTS

  1. long term sick
    used to be incapacity benefit but the govt has migrated the sick onto ESA employment support allowance
    IF you get ESA support group ( for those who cant workk )you recieve the full amount ( very few do )
    however if you are put in ESA W R A G after a year the govt can cut or fully remove your benefits
    ———-
    ESA W R A G is for those who are too ill to work but may return ( or probably wont ) in the future
    —-
    logically if you were deemed physically capable of working you would be put on jobseekers allowance
    as you are too ill to work the only reason there would be for the division of support group / wragg
    is to enable the tories to remove benefits from the long term sick and disabled
    r head in shamevoted tory hang yout

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FOLLOW US

16,637FansLike
9,363FollowersFollow

Latest News

Universal Credit staff poised for further walk-outs

PCS union warns that strike action could spread to more Universal Credit Services Centres.

Number of Brits suffering from malnutrition has soared under the Tories

Labour described the shocking increase in malnutrition cases as "unforgivable" and said government ministers "should be ashamed".

Jeremy Corbyn: Tories failing homeless children and poverty-stricken families

Labour leader vows to end the benefit freeze and halt the rollout of Universal Credit.

Half of private landlords say tenants on Universal Credit have rent arrears

54% of private landlords have tenants on Universal Credit who have fallen behind on rent payments.

130,000 families forced to live in one bed flats due to chronic social housing shortage

Calls for a £12.8bn national investment in social housing building.

More Articles Like This