Home Politics MPs question misleading benefit sanctions statistics

MPs question misleading benefit sanctions statistics

DWP accused of hiding the true number of benefit sanctions behind misleading official statistics.

Must Read

Number of Brits suffering from malnutrition has soared under the Tories

Labour described the shocking increase in malnutrition cases as "unforgivable" and said government ministers "should be ashamed".

Benefit claimant with broken back killed himself after being found ‘fit for work’ by DWP

He was left pennniless and unable to pay the rent or top up his electricity meter.

Universal Credit staff poised for further walk-outs

PCS union warns that strike action could spread to more Universal Credit Services Centres.

UK pensioners ‘suffering the worst poverty rate in western Europe’

Tories warned against further rises to the state pension age.

The Work and Pensions Select Committee has written to employment minister Alok Sharma, over concerns about how the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) report and present official benefit sanctions statistics.

The cross-party group of MPs says official DWP figures “consistently understate the number of sanctions applied for UC, JSA and ESA claimants by updating figures to reflect the post-appeal status” – decisions to sanction claimants that are overturned on appeal.

“This means that every time a sanction decision is overturned at appeal, it no longer appears in the number of sanctions applied”, the Committee claims.

In a press release published on the Parliament website, the Committee continues: “The pre-appeal figure for ESA sanctions was, in one month, as much as 57% higher than the post-appeal figure published by the Department”.

MPs are now demanding an explanation from the DWP and have called on the Department to “publish pre-appeal figures routinely so that the true picture can be understood”.

DWP data also shows that “in February 2018 1,108 Universal Credit claimants were still subject to a sanction despite having moved into in the “Working Enough” or “No Work-Related Requirement” conditionality group”, usually because they are recognised as being too unwell to work or look for work.

Photo credit: jovike via photopin cc

Frank Field MP, Chair of the Committee. said: “What is the point of applying sanctions to people who cannot work and are not expected to look for jobs?

“The DWP have yet to make the case that benefit sanctions work to get people into employment and it’s difficult to see how they can have that affect for people who are ‘working enough’ or cannot work.

“Benefit sanctions are the only major welfare reform this decade to have never been evaluated, and the picture DWP paints of the policy doesn’t match the troubling stories we’ve heard.

“In the wake of the NAO’s damning assessment of Universal Credit, we more than ever need the facts behind the claims.”

This article was last updated at 04:05 (GMT) on 18 July 2018.

SUPPORT US!

If you would like to see more stories like this please consider a one off donation. Thank you for your support!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FOLLOW US

16,637FansLike
9,363FollowersFollow

Latest News

Universal Credit staff poised for further walk-outs

PCS union warns that strike action could spread to more Universal Credit Services Centres.

Number of Brits suffering from malnutrition has soared under the Tories

Labour described the shocking increase in malnutrition cases as "unforgivable" and said government ministers "should be ashamed".

Jeremy Corbyn: Tories failing homeless children and poverty-stricken families

Labour leader vows to end the benefit freeze and halt the rollout of Universal Credit.

Half of private landlords say tenants on Universal Credit have rent arrears

54% of private landlords have tenants on Universal Credit who have fallen behind on rent payments.

130,000 families forced to live in one bed flats due to chronic social housing shortage

Calls for a £12.8bn national investment in social housing building.

More Articles Like This