photo credit: PhylB via photopin cc

In response to: https://welfareweekly.com/welfare-devolved-local-authorities-says-charity/

The benefits that are being devolved to Scotland are:

DLA, PIP, AA, Carers Allowance and Industrial Injuries Benefit (and some control over Discretionary Housing Payments and the frequency and receipt of the Housing Benefit/Allowance element of Universal Credit).

Benefits that are not being devolved include Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA), Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), Housing Benefit and Universal Credit.

This means that the Scottish Parliament will have no control, or say, over the Work Capability Assessment regime, Mandatory Reconsiderations, the Conditionality regime or Benefit Sanctions. All rather important to disabled people.

Nor is it clear how any new devolved benefits (e.g. disability benefits or carers benefits) which the Scottish Parliament could create, or change to mitigate the impact of welfare reforms, will interact with the Means Tested Benefits system; i.e. if the Scottish Parliament decided to establish a new, fairer assessment regime to replace the PIP one and managed to stop tens of thousands of disabled people losing their benefits would they receive the disability premiums, disregards and protection from non-dependent deductions that current recipients are entitled to? There is no guarantee that they would, as the draft clauses published last week do not clarify this issue at all.

There is also the issue that, according to a Cabinet Minister “close to David Cameron” these powers will not be handed over until 2017 at the earliest and in the meantime the migration of DLA claimants to PIP will continue. That transfer will be complete by 2018 by which time, based on DWP projections, 66,000 disabled people will have lost all of their current entitlement (with tens of thousands more partially losing entitlement).

So another problem is that tens of thousands of disabled people will have lost their entitlement BEFORE the devolved powers are transferred, meaning that introducing a fairer regime will become much more difficult as there will be less of a benefits pot to draw on.

Finally the Smith Commission proposals, set out in the draft legislation, will devolve benefits which last year accounted for just £2.5bn of spending, or around one-quarter of all Scottish welfare spending outside the state pension. So with the current proposals Scotland would have much less to spend on 5 million of a population than Manchester would get, if CAB proposals were acted on.

Pat Onions.

2 COMMENTS

  1. The Scots were sold another red herring by Westminster and 55% bit into it. The day the votes were counted Westminster started to renege on what was offered to keep Scotland in the Union.

  2. We will not be tricked again by the TORY government. They don’t deliver we will just leave the UK and declare independence

Leave a comment...

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.