‘Landmark’ Supreme Court judgement means thousands more could get disability benefits

Many more people with mental health problems who find social situations debilitating could now be entitled to claim a disability benefit, a landmark judgment ruled today (Thursday 18 July).

The Supreme Court judgment means that many more people with mental health problems and other disabled people will be entitled to support from Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which replaces Disability Living Allowance. This will particularly affect people who need help to engage with other people and form relationships.

The ruling, by a panel of Supreme Court justices, was made following a challenge by a PIP claimant, a 47-year-old man known as MM, about the way the points scoring system works in PIP assessments.


Mind intervened to support MM’s challenge because of the wider issues his case raised for people with mental health problems.

Photo: Paula Peters

It also marks the first time a case about PIP has been heard in the Supreme Court, the final court of appeal in the UK for civil cases.

MM and Mind successfully argued that the DWP needs to clearly define what counts as support and not dismiss the kinds of help that many people with mental health problems rely on.

The new ruling could especially affect people whose mental health problems lead to isolation and problems interacting. This means more people who need different kinds of help, such as ongoing encouragement from a close family member to leave their house and engage socially, will be able to benefit from PIP.

Sophie Corlett, Mind’s Director of External Relations, said: “This is a landmark moment in the ongoing battle to make sure disabled people are supported through our benefits system to live well.

“Far too many are struggling to claim benefits they need because of draconian assessments, which often fail to take fully into account the impact a mental health problem can have.

“Living with a mental health problem can be extremely isolating but with the right support people can maintain important social connections that in turn can improve their wellbeing.

“Mind hopes, that, with this ruling, thousands more will be able to benefit from much needed help, which could go towards paying for a support worker, or for other help to see trusted family and friends or form and build social ties at support groups.

“We are very proud to have intervened in support of the individual who took this case on behalf of thousands of people with mental health problems.”

Photo Credit: “15.09.2012 – Inner Conflict”, © 2012 Jlhopgood, Flickr | CC-BY-ND | via Wylio

Under the scoring system used by PIP assessors to decide who is eligible for money, assessors have to decide if someone needs ‘prompting’ to engage with other people, or if they needed ‘social support’.

A decision that someone needs ‘prompting’ means they receive a score of two, while if someone needs ‘social support’ they receive a score of four.

PIP claimants need to score a total of eight points across all criteria to be eligible for the basic rate of payment, £58.70 a week. They need to score twelve points to be eligible for the enhanced rate of £87.75 a week. 

Confusion over the criteria, and the difference between ‘prompting’ and ‘social support’ meant that MM was originally deemed ineligible for PIP. MM successfully challenged the decision in the Inner Court in Scotland but the Government appealed the decision to the Supreme Court.

Mind intervened to support MM’s challenge because of the wider issues his case raised for people with mental health problems applying for PIP.

The Department for Work and Pensions was arguing for a more limited or restricted understanding of what should be properly considered ‘social support’. Under this interpretation far fewer people would meet this threshold and so fewer people would be entitled to PIP overall.

The courts agreed with the arguments put forward by MM and Mind. This means that many more people will be entitled to four points under this activity rather than two. For thousands that could mean the difference between getting a PIP award and being turned down for the benefit.

It is too early to know the exact number of people who will be affected. However Mind is aware that this question is one of the most important and relevant parts of the PIP assessment for thousands of people with mental health problems.

Since PIP was introduced more than 425,000 people with conditions classed as ‘psychiatric disorders’ have been turned down for the benefit.


Source: Press release from the mental health charity Mind – images added by Welfare Weekly.


Get News Updates!

Register to receive a notification each time we publish a new story. Don't worry, we'll never spam you and it's easy to cancel at any time. Service provided by Google Feedburner.

- Sponsored Content -

Trending Now

Nearly half of DWP staff are dependent on benefits to make ends meet

At least 40% of DWP staff are claiming benefits to top-up low wages.

UK pensioners ‘suffering the worst poverty rate in western Europe’

Tories warned against further rises to the state pension age.

Social housing tenants who damage their home ‘should face benefit sanctions’, report says

Report claims "rogue tenants" have cost taxpayers in London around £3.4million since 2014.

A homeless person dies every 19 hours in austerity Britain

Services are failing to protect homelessness people, say campaigners.

The Latest

‘World stumbling zombie-like into a digital welfare dystopia’, warns UN report

Report condemns "intrusive government surveillance systems" used to cut welfare spending and generate profits for private companies.

Nearly half of DWP staff are dependent on benefits to make ends meet

At least 40% of DWP staff are claiming benefits to top-up low wages.

New DWP Secretary refuses to commit to ending the benefit freeze

Thérèse Coffey also claimed there is "no causal link" between the two-child benefit limit and rising child poverty.

Tenancy reforms leave private renters at risk of ‘revenge evictions’

Tenants who complain about or request repairs unfairly removed from their homes.

Social housing tenants who damage their home ‘should face benefit sanctions’, report says

Report claims "rogue tenants" have cost taxpayers in London around £3.4million since 2014.

New SNP childcare pledge to ‘lift families out of poverty’

Free childcare pledge to save families £4,500 per year for each child.

Follow Us

16,662FansLike
9,378FollowersFollow

More Articles Like This