Home Welfare Reform We Would 'End Unfair ATOS-Style Disability Benefit Assessments', Say UKIP

We Would ‘End Unfair ATOS-Style Disability Benefit Assessments’, Say UKIP

Must Read

Benefit claimant with broken back killed himself after being found ‘fit for work’ by DWP

He was left pennniless and unable to pay the rent or top up his electricity meter.

UK pensioners ‘suffering the worst poverty rate in western Europe’

Tories warned against further rises to the state pension age.

Jeremy Corbyn: Tories failing homeless children and poverty-stricken families

Labour leader vows to end the benefit freeze and halt the rollout of Universal Credit.

Half of private landlords say tenants on Universal Credit have rent arrears

54% of private landlords have tenants on Universal Credit who have fallen behind on rent payments.

The UK Independence Party (UKIP) in government would end “unfair Atos-style disability benefit assessments”, deputy chairman Suzanne Evans has said.

In a move which may surprise many of our readers, who rightly (in our view) consider UKIP to be more right-wing than the Tories, Suzanne said her party would take a “firm but very fair approach” to the benefits system.

Even writing about UKIP is something we at the Welfare News Service feel deeply uncomfortable about, but in the interest of balance (and non-party bias) we must.

Labour has pledged to reform ‘fit for work’ tests, but has so far stopped short of promising to scrap the controversial system entirely. It is unclear as to what UKIP would replace the disability benefit assessments with, if anything.

Writing on the parties website she said UKIP “recognises the need for Government to provide a strong safety net when circumstances prevent people being self-sufficient financially”.

However, she also made it clear that her party in government would send a “clear statement that welfare abuses would not be tolerated”, referring to an extreme minority (0.7%) of individuals who attempt to cheat the system.

Suzanne Evans writes that UKIP’s position on welfare would be set out using “two core principles”: rewarding people who have paid more in national insurance with higher benefits, and demanding that migrants contribute to the economy before they can “take from it” – through the introducing of a “five-year embargo” on new benefit claims.

UKIP would “pay more to job seekers who’ve already paid tax and national insurance for five years”, writes the deputy chairman, but clamp down “on benefits for migrants”.

The initial statement will worry sick and disabled people, who may not have been able to contribute as much in national insurance compared to fit and able-bodied individuals, who will fear that this may mean they would have to settle for less if UKIP ever gets a taste of power.

As well as pledging to put an end to disability benefit assessments and addressing (overstated) benefit fraud, Suzanne said UKIP would also tackle so-called “welfare tourism”, which some experts (on both sides of the English Channel) insist doesn’t exist.

UKIP would also stop child benefit payments from being paid for “children who don’t live here” and limit all child benefit claims to no more than two children.

The party say they would also scrap the highly controversial ‘bedroom tax’ and may consider removing sex and relationship education for primary school children.

Labour has already pledged to axe the ‘bedroom tax’ if they win a majority in the next general election. The same promise has been made by the SNP, if the event that welfare powers are devolved to Scotland.

 

SUPPORT US!

If you would like to see more stories like this please consider a one off donation. Thank you for your support!

3 COMMENTS

  1. Except they won't. "The initial statement will worry sick and disabled people, who may not have been able to contribute as much in national insurance compared to fit and able-bodied individuals, who will fear that this may mean they would have to settle for less if UKIP ever gets a taste of power " Labour are snorting about a similar 'get what you pay in' policy, meaning those in secure, long term employment will pay in more and get more than those who need social security most, i.e. those who can't get secure, long term employment. Another offering from the UKIP policy flip flop shop. As they're committed to reducing social security for disabled/additional needs people. Parties seem to be shifting fitness for work policy to the NHS – the newly privatised NHS that is. Using similar tick box exercises to Atos/Maximus. Re: the 5 year embargo for immigrants; cue emigres taking on even more low paid, unsocial hours work to compensate for being unable to receive social security to top up their earnings and the lack of child benefit they're entitled to for contributing via taxes and NI.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FOLLOW US

16,639FansLike
9,361FollowersFollow

Latest News

Jeremy Corbyn: Tories failing homeless children and poverty-stricken families

Labour leader vows to end the benefit freeze and halt the rollout of Universal Credit.

Half of private landlords say tenants on Universal Credit have rent arrears

54% of private landlords have tenants on Universal Credit who have fallen behind on rent payments.

130,000 families forced to live in one bed flats due to chronic social housing shortage

Calls for a £12.8bn national investment in social housing building.

Paralympian supports disability charity at ‘Superhero Triathlon’

Participants came from across the United Kingdom.

Homeless children forced to live in shipping containers, report says

Children's Commissioner slams the "unforgiving welfare system" and high rents for trapping homeless families in temporary accommodation.

More Articles Like This