Thursday, November 21, 2019
Home Society ‘Biased’ fit for work tests penalise poorer people

‘Biased’ fit for work tests penalise poorer people

New study finds that disabled people living in deprived areas are more likely to lose their benefits under the government’s controversial assessments system.

Powered by article titled “‘Biased’ fit for work tests penalise poorer people” was written by Frances Ryan, for The Guardian on Tuesday 9th August 2016 13.00 UTC

“Fit for work” tests are “significantly biased” against claimants in poor areas of the country, new research seen exclusively by the Guardian shows.

Analysis of more than a million incapacity benefit claimants who have been re-assessed for employment and support allowance (ESA), the benefit for people too disabled or ill to work, shows the controversial work capability assessment is disproportionately removing benefits from people in more deprived regions.

At the same time, it found claimants in wealthier areas are more likely not only to retain their sickness benefits – and avoid being declared fit for work – but to be placed in the support group of ESA, in which claimants are not required to undertake any form of work preparation and receive the highest benefit rate.

The study analyses government data from over 300 local authorities between 2007 and 2015 and is published next week in the journal Radical Statistics. It further shows that, counterintuitively, healthier areas found claimants fit for work less often, and placed claimants into the support group more frequently, than areas with higher rates of disability and illness.

“With an accurate test of disability, it would be expected that areas with lower disability and ill health would find more people fit for work,” Jonathan Hume, the author of the research, says. “As it stands, areas where people have the most need for ESA – so higher poverty, higher disability – are the ones removing it at a higher rate.”

Such findings are consistent with the idea that, as part of wider reduction in support for disabled people, the “fit for work” test was designed to cut support rather than better target it to those who “truly need it” as the government has repeatedly claimed, Hume adds.

There have been widespread concerns about the validity of this test in recent years, with critics saying it is inaccurate, discriminates against mentally ill people and those with fluctuating illnesses, and causes widespread stress and even suicidal feelings among claimants.

Ministers pressed ahead with the rapid expansion of the test to reassess 1.5 million existing incapacity benefit claimants in May 2011, despite warnings from their own adviser, Professor Malcolm Harrington, that the rollout should be delayed until the test could be improved.

The fact that this latest research analyses people previously on the benefit is significant because it shows that they were all assessed as meeting a minimum level of disability. As such, anyone subsequently found fit for work by a work capability assessment had been previously identified as having a significant health problem.

In order to determine the causes and extent of any bias in the test, it would be necessary to have access to data about individual claimants – for example, their disability, income and background – which is currently unfeasible due to confidentiality concerns. Still, the research has established a significant relationship between work capability assessment outcomes and local educational attainment. In areas where children finish school with more GCSEs, claimants were placed into the support group more frequently rather than being placed in the work-related activity group – the group in which disabled people must undertake preparation for a return for work or risk having their benefits sanctioned.

Hume says that a possible explanation of this is that people with more qualifications might be more able to complete the significant paperwork required to claim ESA, or are better at seeking appropriate evidence and assistance.

“Ultimately the DWP [Department for Work and Pensions] is making decisions that seem to be influenced by factors other than the health of the claimant,” he adds.

A Department for Work and Pensions spokeswoman criticised the report and said it makes a huge leap in attributing local variation in work capability assessment outcomes to “bias”. She said: “The report is entirely misleading and we don’t recognise the findings. The fact is eligibility for employment and support allowance is not dependent on the area where a claimant lives, but rather on the effect a person’s health condition or disability has on their ability to work.”

The Spartacus Network, a group of disabled campaigners who have previously undertaken influential research into ESA, says the study offers disturbing findings in an area that has so far been seriously overlooked. “The lack of previous analysis in this area is indicative of successive governments’ disregard for the effectiveness of ESA and the work capability assessment, compounded by indifference to the rights and concerns of sick and disabled people,” says the Spartacus researcher Caroline Richardson.

The findings are particularly relevant in light of the government’s impending cut of £30 a week for many new ESA claimants, due to take effect next year.


With the UN investigation into the UK’s alleged violations of disabled people’s rights due to be published in 2017, all eyes are on whether fit for work tests – and the wider disability benefit system – are themselves fit for purpose. © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Follow Us


Trending Now

A homeless person dies every 19 hours in austerity Britain

Services are failing to protect homelessness people, say campaigners.

UK pensioners ‘suffering the worst poverty rate in western Europe’

Tories warned against further rises to the state pension age.

Benefit payment dates over Christmas and New Year 2019-20

You may receive benefit payments early over Christmas and New Year. Check here to see if this applies to you and your family.

Benefit claimants told to fork out £1400 to record disability assessments

Disabled people told to pay for expensive specialist equipment if they want benefit assessments to be recorded.

‘Pensionless Pensioner’ Brands UK Government Most Brutal ‘Regime’ In Living Memory

Woman stripped of her right to state pension says the UK Government doesn't care whether vulnerable people live or die.

More News

Labour declares ‘war on poverty’ and pledges to scrap Tory welfare reforms

Tory austerity has entrenched poverty and destitution across Britain, say Labour.

Disabled man found dead at Jobcentre within months of being declared ‘fit for work’ by the DWP

Campaigners have called for benefit assessments to be suspended after the man's sudden death.

800,000 more children from working households pushed into poverty since 2010

Labour says the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats "should hang their heads in shame".

Lib Dems pledge to scrap the benefit cap and ‘cruel’ two-child limit

Lib Dems pledge to invest £6bn a year to "strengthen the welfare system", despite endorsing many of the cuts that have weakened it.

Shock at 160% rise in child suicides in Scotland

Scottish Government admits that the rising suicide rate is "heartbreaking".

Follow Us


More Articles Like This